Article delivery of news and comments http://www.corrierenews.it/corrierenews3100/content/view/full/40716 # The so-called "animal rights", 17 years after
Several associations involved Innauguration
the new kennel Montegranaro
In response to an article published earlier this week
animal welfare organizations non-profit organization Friends of Animals Osimo, Friends of Fido Onlus di Civitanova, I will not leave you Onlus Civitanova, Anita Falconara Onlus, the Qua Paw Onlus Castelfidardo and Canine Senigallia Senigallia, reading the article in the Resto del Carlino on 13/10/2009 consider that if this were not so tragic for the animals, surely it would be a farce.
Legambiente Circle Sibilla, some founders of the kennel and Pluto a PC that seems to want to remain anonymous, maybe they forgot that for 17 years in the tree then the dogs seized in March 2007 by the competent bodies (NIRDA Investigative Unit for crimes to the detriment of the animals of the State Forestry Corps, Lav and Ass LEAF), lived in appalling conditions is certainly not required by law.
about hundred dogs were kept permanently in a chain, dilapidated kennels, cani rinchiusi nella stalla della casa colonica completamente al buio in compagnia solo di topi, box costruiti con materiale di fortuna uno dentro l’altro come scatole cinesi. Cani che non hanno mai avuto la possibilità di sgambare in uno spazio apposito come la legge prevede. Nessun ambulatorio presente nella struttura. Registri di carico e scarico dei cani assenti. Addirittura gatti rinchiusi in una piccola roulotte proprio lì vicino ai cani. Mancanza totale di sistema fognario adeguato alla normativa vigente. Non ci stiamo inventando nulla. Ci sono testimonianze e fotografie che parlano da sole.
Ora leggiamo che questi cosiddetti “animalisti” sembrano, a loro dire, gli unici a preoccuparsi delle condizioni dei cani affidati all’associazione DOOR after the seizure of 2007. Who knows before and for 17 years where they were!
I wonder why, instead of applauding people, with enormous sacrifices in a short time has managed to create a structure that finally allow these animals to live ethologically according to their nature, continues to unabashedly throw mud and discrediting completely free without any shame.
We are ashamed of us and we regret not being able by our own forces, to act first to stop the painful situation that led to great suffering for years to host animals.
Unfortunately we used to clash daily with private operators who do not follow the law and speculate on the dog kennel, and it remains difficult believe that animal welfare groups for years could justify serious situations such as when they were the dogs of Pluto House and continue in their efforts to demolish those who endeavor only and solely in the interest of the animals.
There is not even that it is prohibited from access to volunteers how to write the article. We have always gone and no one has ever denied entry and have had first hand the progress that has been carried out, despite the extreme difficulty of shooting a structure, dilapidated, with inadequate hygienic and very little chance of change.
last Sunday, October 11, 2009, the long-awaited day has come after so many years. Who's really an animal as he professed in public, should put aside pride, personal vendettas, repressed hatred and be in solidarity with those who have been able to achieve such a structure where within a few weeks will be transferred to those poor dogs.
What did he want? Let stay for life and still continue to accept other dogs in that camp?
It 'really can not continue to defend the indefensible.
Comments
ANIMAL PROTECTION ASSOCIATION PROVINCIAL Onlus Ascoli Piceno
Friday, October 23, 2009 15:22:25 ALESSANDRO ORLANESI
Avoiding another poison to vomit up a story where only strict legal action against degli Enti locali e delle locali ASL avrebbero reso giustizia all'inferno patito dall'Associazione Pluto colpevole solo per avere con molto coraggio e tanto cuore cercato di gestire una emergenza che negli anni novanta era diventata una grave questione di pubblica sicurezza. Ma la conoscete davvero questa gente alla quale hanno lacerato pure l'anima dopo averla infangata di calunnie ? Io ho avuto la fortuna di incontrarla e vi posso assicurare che almeno meriterebbe il diritto di non essere più molestata.
Risposta alle 5 ONLUS
Giovedì, 22 Ottobre 2009 18:00:58Lidia Gomez Olivera
In merito a tutti gli articoli di questi giorni inerenti l’inaugurazione del nuovo Canile di Montegranaro avremmo nicely avoided any ns. intervention. Since the conduct of our hut under. management has been called into question by 5 non-profit organization of the Marche region, we consider it necessary, especially on behalf of the hundreds of rescued animals and assigned under the ns. management and especially on behalf of those who, starting from the day after the raid, back in 2007, have not seen the light of the sun, put some notes certainly unknown to the "floor".
no objection to the conditions experienced by the five non-profit organization in the dilapidated structure, although we sincerely unaware of the frequency of their visits. These requirements, fully aware of the Mayors of the time since the birth of the "shelter" we found them in our. take over the management of the kennel first. Conditions certainly become extreme by refusing ever received by the technical department of the municipality where the property is located at each ns. enhancement request, but in which they found accommodation, alternating from back in 1990 some 6,500 abandoned animals and the veterinary service or snare. Or the five non-profit organization would prefer to leave them to their fate of strays, with all the negative social consequences which would have led to the detriment of themselves, the increase of stray dogs and the environment of the stop?
We were always well aware that the structure of "Pluto House" was not in accordance with, the more times we complain, as well as paper claims, also through the press the need for radical change, as they were well aware of the 22 mayors when, in 2005, through a testimony to the press had publicly acknowledged the need to provide for new shelter by allowing the use of existing structure for a good 5 more years. So
full awareness and knowledge of everyone from private to public institutions within the Corps' special Nas and Noe as a result of their inspections constatanti the decline of the place but the highest health status of the animals, and lack of abuse, provided, however, recognized the current management and publicly disclosed through two articles of the same on 03.24.2007 (DRC) and 03/25/2007 (CA)
But above all, fully aware that the House of Pluto was the only structure that can stop the evolution of stray otherwise uncontested mainly due to sterilizations full cost of the association before the speech on the ASL.
Each character linked to the association, to the municipalities, at the peak of the Health Risk has always known that she could run while standing in this situation, a situation which has, however, allowed the animals to "no" to be treated, satisfied and entrusted in spite of contrary thinking and ultimately received only damage the association.
If we were wrong in the "save" animals, we are prepared to suffer the consequences even if we only made available to those who, abandoning the one part and the other picked up.
It describes the "house" as full of rats, but over the years, any dog \u200b\u200bor staff has ever died from disease caused by rats, perhaps by virtue of the rat extermination always done, you have to speak a hundred dogs and chain yet we forget that the chain has saved those 100 lives, you can create a dilapidated dog kennels, but no dog has ever died because they subjected to the elements, citing cats locked up in a small trailer, certainly better than cats who walk between the teeth of dogs, but especially speaking di assenza totale di registri di carico e scarico.
A questo punto ci è dovuto invitare le 5 Onlus, di cui una, dal mese di Luglio c.a., attraverso alcuni suoi componenti , presta il proprio lavoro nella struttura ex Pluto House , a chiedere al Nas e al Noe come mai abbiano potuto consentire ad un’associazione priva della dovuta documentazione di continuare a gestire una struttura ed ancor più di richiedere al Corpo Forestale dello Stato intervenuto nel blitz del 12 marzo 07 l’esibizione di tutta la documentazione posta sotto sequestro attraverso la quale riusciranno finalmente a verificare il contrario di quanto loro riportato.
Noi in quella struttura abbiamo dovuto lasciare 547 animali. Dal 12 marzo del 2007, di questi animali, senza that no one else has been able to find shelter, 50 were in foster care and 58 were transferred to other facilities, present the current state, as reported by the management, 310 animals. For the difference we leave to the reader the answer.
As we leave the answer to those who applaud the new structure with a maximum capacity of 300 animals.
Strange to say, a cutting-edge facility that is not even enough to accommodate those who would find refuge in the old nor the 54 dogs, hook up after 12 March 2007 in the territory of four municipalities under contract who are in retirement other shelters in the area, including one outside asl.
