Decipher Master Combination Locks

Malpensa e III pista - altra occasione sprecata

regret to note that once again it was wasted a great opportunity to make our voices heard.

here share the post of U.S. to Fern which has raised interest.

Ferno's administration declared themselves opposed to the expansion of the airport area of \u200b\u200bGaggio.

For the group United for a then record defeat Ferno we?

We can not deny that the motion was rejected, but we definitely got the result of Malpensa talk about it in an appropriate forum: City Council. We believe that such an important decision to see the involvement not only representatives of us, but also the public. The City Council is discussing in a first step.

A little 'just when you think that the initial objective was to achieve a unified stance to protect a slice of the "Parco del Ticino".

is no small thing when you consider that so far in Ferno argument had not spoken in a "serious" within the institutional settings, but now we have the mouth of the mayor's commitment team leaders to sit around a table groped to reach a common position, and the commitment of the Mayor to establish a Town Council action open to the public.

In recent months, the idea of \u200b\u200bdrawing the track III si è fatta via via più concreta nella testa dei fernesi ed i cittadini vedono il rifiuto dell’espansione, come la rinuncia all’opportunità di avere una risorsa economica.

Ci sentiamo di poter rassicurare i Fernesi sotto questo fronte, attualmente il lavoro a Malpensa è diminuito, non certo perché l’aeroporto si sia ridotto di dimesione, ma perché la congiuntura economica che tutt’ora ci investe ha modificato i volumi del traffico aereo.

Inoltre, dire no alla terza pista non vuol dire dire no allo sviluppo dell'aeroporto che potrebbe incrementare del 100 % Their traffic volumes without the third runway.

At this point there are two fronts, the anti-III runway that directly affected and those in favor of the property because they want to get the greatest benefit.

True, and this is one way, in our view wrong to "plan and the future of the territory" and to respond to citizens. Say how he does the majority leader of the problem is at the limit of Lonate Pozzolo and in particular to the inhabitants of Tornavento, is a position that we can never share.

Paradoxically the state that has arisen is that three administrations of the political spectrum, have diametrically opposed positions depending on the convenience of the moment.

He could not even obliged to re-uniting the opposition to fernesi.

This is not news that members of the group mixed with a majority vote, to tell the truth about 13 points of this City Council voted with them 13 times out of 13. Behave a bit 'ironic considering that in so doing, endorse all decisions made by others, it is certain that as long as you inform reading <<>> rather than as admitted by Councillor Foresti read the Mitre study, it is difficult to get a complete idea of \u200b\u200bthe problem.

What we like to point out however, is that all opposition (but also the administration of Cardano al Campo) center-left wants to give an airport that does not work, but you go to a development without limits

you want then keep blackmail Sea and the development of Malpensa

Today Malpensa is an economic reality and important work for the south of the province, we would be irresponsible to want to erase.

We reiterate today that Malpensa is so for reasons estrenee to the territory, we must reiterate that Malpensa had its peak in 2007 and 2008 by more than 23 million passengers fly in the face of a shared understanding with the territory, if you want to at least triple these numbers, you must sit at a table and negotiate the rules of the game

Maybe you want to say that you are prepared to concede territory to Malpensa in the face of any work for compensation.

Absolutely not, we can not allow our territory (or that of our neighbors Lonato) is "consumed" indiscriminately, it is true that the work is a primary resource for humans, but we are sure you have a nursery school sponsored "Sea" or "Pincopallino," as Mr. Mayor, would suffice to say that we got a good we reward?

What we wanted to highlight the words "rules of the game" was the overthrow of a point of view: Who says that the territory is capable of supporting such a structure?

So a precise reference to the SEA?

Certainly, the Vas è l’unico strumento che se fatto con scrupolo è in grado di dire se l’azienda Malpensa può vivere in simbiosi con il territorio che la ospita cioè se può svilupparsi, garantendo crescita economica e maggior occupazione senza sciupare un bene prezioso come il territorio arrivando con uno strumento oggettivo a capire che si può parlare di questo sviluppo senza una terza pista...